Purpose
A trauma center project for treating patients with trauma has been established in Korea. A trauma team is activated based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) field triage Step 1 for patient triage. Here, we determined if the currently applied criteria were appropriate for the triage of patients with trauma in Korea.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who were taken to the regional trauma center from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019, and were registered in the Korean Trauma database. The rates for undertriage and overtriage were calculated from the in-field and in-hospital triage according to the CDC guidelines Step 1.
Results
Among the 9,383 patients transferred to the trauma center, 3,423 were directly transferred from the site and were investigated. The overall rates for undertriage and overtriage of these patients were 28.13% and 30.35%, respectively. For the patients who received in-field triage and were directly transferred to the trauma center, the rates for undertriage and overtriage were 27.92% and 32.39%, and 25.92% and 29.11% for in-hospital triage, respectively. The concordance rate of triage was 87.09%.
Conclusion
The current use of in-hospital triage physiological criteria as set out in the CDC guidelines Step 1, indicated an undertriage rate which was high and an overtriage rate within the acceptable range. Further studies on triaging patients with trauma are warranted. Improvements in the guidelines of the trauma center project are necessary and this needs to be supported by resources and training for field personnel.

Purpose
Managing patients with hemorrhagic shock is mainly dependent on stopping the bleeding as fast as possible. Emergency Department laparotomy (EDL) is considered one of the approaches to control intra-abdominal bleeding rapidly. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of EDL in a regional trauma center of Pusan National University Hospital in a 4-year period.
Methods
The medical records and data of patients who underwent EDL from January 2016 to December 2019 were analyzed. Patients who underwent preperitoneal pelvic packing only or did not receive surgery immediately after EDL were excluded.
Results
Twenty-four patients who underwent EDL were included in the study. 18 patients had sustained blunt trauma, and 6 suffered from penetrating injuries. Small bowel mesentery and liver injuries were the most frequent. Increase of median systolic blood pressure (SBP) after EDL was 55.5 mmHg. Four (16.7%) out of the 24 survived; one of the four survivors received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In the nonsurvivor group, Injury Severity Score was significantly higher (p = 0.013), initial pH was lower (p = 0.035) and the amount of packed red blood cells transfusion after EDL was significantly higher (p = 0.013) than those in the survivor group.
Conclusion
The mortality rate was very high in trauma patients who were required EDL. Although EDL was not proved to be an effective procedure for resuscitation in trauma patients, it could be considered as one of the treatment options for trauma patients in extremis. Further studies are required to examine the effects of EDL.