• KSACS
  • KTACN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
JOURNAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

7
results for

"Appendectomy"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Appendectomy"

Original Articles

Purpose
Nonoperative management (NOM) with percutaneous drainage is widely used for periappendiceal abscesses, but the necessity of interval appendectomy (IA) remains debated. This study evaluated the feasibility of NOM without IA and compared outcomes with IA after NOM.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted of 53 patients who underwent percutaneous drainage for periappendiceal abscess between January 2009 and December 2019 at Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital. Patients were categorized into NOM only (n=26) and IA after NOM (n=27). Clinical data, including demographics, abscess characteristics, laboratory findings, treatment course, and follow-up outcomes, were analyzed.
Results
The recurrence rate after NOM was 7.7%, with all recurrent cases successfully treated surgically and no malignancies detected. Patients in the NOM group were older (62.4±11.5 years vs. 49.5±21.9 years, P=0.007) and had more comorbidities (76.9% vs. 33.3%, P=0.004). The IA group had larger abscesses and higher inflammatory markers. NOM patients had shorter hospital stays (7.9±5.6 days vs. 12.9±6.6 days, P=0.003) and a shorter total antibiotic duration (median [interquartile range]: 15 days [12–18 days] vs. 21 days [15–27 days]; P=0.005). No drainage-related complications occurred.
Conclusion
NOM without IA appears to be a feasible option for selected patients with periappendiceal abscess. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine patient selection.
  • 313 View
  • 10 Download

Emergency surgery, Basic

Purpose
Surgery and nonoperative management (NOM) are the treatment modalities for acute appendicitis (AA). There is little evidence to indicate which treatment method should be performed according to the patient's condition or disease severity, surgical extension, and timing after an appendectomy. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (PIAA) associated with these factors.
Methods
The medical records of 839 patients who underwent appendectomy after a diagnosis of AA between 2019 and 2020 at Gangneung Asan Medical Centre were reviewed retrospectively. The factors associated with PIAA were evaluated.
Results
Postoperative complications occurred in 92 patients. Following appendectomy, 16 (1.9%), 83 (9.9%), and three (0.4%) patients developed PIAA, surgical site infection, and incisional hernia, respectively. The American Society of Anesthesiologists class, complicated appendicitis on preoperative abdominal computed tomography, failure of NOM, and extensive surgery above appendectomy were associated with the development of PIAA. However, a laparoscopic approach, irrigation, indwelling drain, ultrasonic dissection, and use of sterile bags were not associated with the development of PIAA.
Conclusion
NOM for some patients with complicated AA is an attractive treatment modality. However, to reduce the incidence of PIAA, the application of NOM should be circumspect considering patient factors and the nature of acute appendicitis. Furthermore, appendectomy should be performed as early as possible for patients not indicated for NOM.
  • 3,856 View
  • 33 Download

Review Article

Emergency surgery, Organ(liver, bowel, kideny etc.)

The Benefits and Risks of Performing Incidental Appendectomy
Jin Young Lee, Young Hoon Sul, Jin Bong Ye, Seung Je Go, Jin Suk Lee, Hong Rye Kim, Soo Young Yoon, Joong Suck Kim
J Acute Care Surg 2019;9(2):35-38.   Published online October 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2019.9.2.35
Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency abdominal surgery worldwide. The risks and benefits of incidental appendectomy during other operations have been debated for over a century. There is no right answer to the question of whether or not to perform incidental appendectomy. Although there are only a few indications where it is explicitly recommended such as in gynecological surgery, malrotation, and Ladd’s procedure, incidental appendectomy is cost-effective in selected patient groups, especially in the young, without an increase in morbidity and mortality. In this review, the literature on incidental appendectomy was assessed from several perspectives.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The association between history of appendectomy and gut microbiota composition: a follow-up cross-sectional study
    Matija Hadžić, Paul Hammer, Carsten Krumbiegel, Olga Moskalenko, Andrija Karačić, Daria Hadžić
    Frontiers in Microbiology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Should We Perform Incidental Appendectomy in Trauma Patients Undergoing Laparotomy?
    Erin Morris, Brianna Marschke, Bryan Bashrum, Chathurika S. Dhanasekara, Arham Siddiqui, Amber Tucker, Sharmila Dissanaike
    The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(6): 2996.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Appendectomy on Gut Microbiota
    Abdurakhmon T. Babakhanov, Aueskhan T. Dzhumabekov, Alexey V. Zhao, Yerlan K. Kuandykov, Shynar B. Tanabayeva, Ildar R. Fakhradiyev, Yana Nazarenko, Timur M. Saliev
    Surgical Infections.2021; 22(7): 651.     CrossRef
  • 23,996 View
  • 291 Download
  • 3 Crossref

Original Articles

Emergency surgery

Predictors of Failed Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Perforated Appendicitis
Sean Martin, Yijin Wert, Zach Lyon, Leonardo Geraci
J Acute Care Surg 2018;8(2):59-64.   Published online October 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2018.8.2.59
Purpose:

A recent internal review of a community-based hospital system revealed a 19.19% rate of conversion from a laparoscopic appendectomy to an open procedure. This study examined the preoperative risk factors for failed laparoscopic appendectomy requiring a conversion to a laparotomy.

Methods:

A total of 198 patients presented with perforated appendicitis. Perforation was defined as a computed tomography (CT) scan interpretation, pathology findings, or surgical findings. Of these patients, 161 underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopy converted to an open procedure. The preoperative risk factors in the two groups were compared through a retrospective chart review.

Results:

Through multivariant analysis, age greater than 45 was the greatest risk factor for the need to convert to an open procedure with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.51. A CT scan read of perforation was associated with a significant 2.65 OR. The C-reactive protein was 19.82 mg/L in the failed laparoscopic cases and 9.96 mg/L in the laparoscopic cases.

Conclusion:

Patients older than 45 years old with a CT radiologist’s read of a perforation in multivariant analysis have an increased risk of failed laparoscopic surgery requiring conversion to open surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intra and Postoperative Advantages of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Complicated Appendicitis
    Andrej Nikolovski, Cemal Ulusoy
    PRILOZI.2022; 43(2): 59.     CrossRef
  • 6,011 View
  • 55 Download
  • 1 Crossref

Basic, Organ(liver, bowel, kideny etc.)

Multi-Detector Computed Tomography Coronal View for Deciding Optimal Incision Site in Acute Appendicitis
Jun Won Son, Seong Beom Oh, Hyun Young Cho
J Acute Care Surg 2017;7(1):23-29.   Published online April 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2017.7.1.23
Purpose:

This study identifies the optimal incision site by describing the relationship between McBurney’s point and the base of appendix using the coronal view of abdominal multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods:

We reviewed the records of 206 patients with positive MDCT findings who were histologically diagnosed with acute appendicitis after appendectomy between January 2014 and September 2015. The outer 1/3 point between two points, the umbilicus and the right anterior superior iliac spine, was marked as McBurney’s point on the coronal view. The superoinferior, mediolateral and radial distances between the base of appendix and McBurney’s point were measured and recorded.

Results:

The average age was 35.1±20.3 years. There were 34 patients below the age of 15-years-old (children), and 172 patients over 15-years-old (adults). In 35.4% of patients, the base of appendix was located within a radius of 2 cm from the McBurney’s point, in 39.8% it was within 2∼4 cm, and in 24.8% was over 4 cm. The average center coordinate of the base of inflamed appendix in our patients is 9.32 mm, 8.31 mm and the distance between two points is 12.5 mm.

Conclusion:

The location of appendix has wide individual variability; therefore the McBurney’s point has limitations as an anatomic landmark. If we choose to customize appendectomy incisions considering the base of appendix by using an abdominal MDCT coronal view, additional incision site extension can be reduced.

  • 5,716 View
  • 67 Download

Infection/Sepsis, Emergency surgery

Is Single Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics Enough after Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis?
Soon Min Choi, Seung Hwan Lee, Ji Young Jang, Hyung Won Kim, Myung Jae Jung, Jae Gil Lee
J Acute Care Surg 2015;5(2):59-63.   Published online October 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2015.5.2.59
Purpose:

Research comparing the effectiveness of different doses of antibiotics prior to surgery for preventing infection is sparse. This study examines whether a single dose of preoperative antibiotics suffices to treat uncomplicated appendicitis via laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods:

This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 149 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from July 2013 to December 2014 in a single institution. The participants were divided into two groups; group A (n=99) was given a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics before surgery, and group B (n=50) was given both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics. Clinical factors and surgical outcomes were compared between two groups.

Results:

The mean length of hospital stay for group A (2.5 days) was shorter than for group B (3.2 days) (p<0.001). Average operation time was 58.7 minutes for group A, longer than for group B (52.2 minutes, p=0.027). There was no difference in pathologic results and postoperative complications, such as surgical site infection (SSI) between the two groups. In groups A and B, 4.0% of patients had superficial SSIs. One patient (2.0%) in group B had deep/organ SSI.

Conclusion:

A single dose of prophylactic antibiotics administration to patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy is acceptable as a treatment in uncomplicated appendicitis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Đánh giá vai trò của kháng sinh dự phòng và kháng sinh sau mổ trong ngăn ngừa nhiễm trùng sau phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị viêm ruột thừa cấp chưa biến chứng
    Nguyễn Thanh Xuân, Phạm Minh Đức , Nguyễn Minh Thảo
    Tạp chí Y học lâm sàng Bệnh viện Trung Ương Huế.2024; (90): 18.     CrossRef
  • 7,086 View
  • 61 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Review Article

Emergency surgery, Organ(liver, bowel, kideny etc.)

A Review of Acute Appendicitis
Ki Hoon Kim
J Acute Care Surg 2015;5(1):10-14.   Published online April 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2015.5.1.10

Acute abdomen can occasionally develop into a life-threatening condition requiring prompt diagnosis and emergency surgery. Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of those emergency surgeries. Delay in the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis leads to substantial increases in morbidity, length of hospitalization and cost. Therefore, immediate appendectomy is the standard treatment for appendicitis, and most patients with an acute appendicitis undergo a simple appendectomy. The treatment of appendicitis depends on both the patient's general condition and the state of the inflamed appendix. This review of appendicitis will describe the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Case Study of Acute Appendicitis Improved by Pharmacopuncture Treatment
    Soo-ho Cho, Chul Jung, Keum-ji Kim, Seok-jae Ko, Hwan-su Jung, Jae-woo Park
    The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine.2019; 40(2): 208.     CrossRef
  • 12,553 View
  • 1,339 Download
  • 1 Crossref
TOP