Purpose This retrospective study investigated the feasibility, diagnostic, and therapeutic advantages of the gastrografin challenge on patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO).
Methods There were 125 patients reviewed who were admitted to the Department of General Surgery at a single institution (September 2018 to August 2019) with a diagnosis related to ASBO. The study population included 100 patients (114 cases) who had received initial conservative management. Patient characteristics and operation rates were compared between the gastrografin challenge success group and failure group, and operation rates and length of hospital stay were compared between the gastrografin challenge group and “non-challenge” group.
Results During the study period, 21 patients with ASBO underwent the gastrografin challenge. The challenge was successful in 17 patients where the bowel obstruction was resolved without the need for surgery. Among patients who failed the challenge, 2 patients underwent adhesiolysis and 2 patients were able to progress their diet avoiding surgery. In patients who underwent surgery (n = 2), the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the gastrografin challenge group compared with the “non-challenge” group sub analysis (n = 13 cases; 10.5 vs. 20 days, p = 0.038), indicating that the gastrografin challenge assisted rapid decision-making for surgery. No adverse events were reported for the 21 gastrografin challenges.
Conclusion In patients with ASBO, the gastrografin challenge is an accurate, safe method to determine the need for surgery. In addition, the gastrografin challenge may reduce the length of stay in patients who required surgery for ASBO resolution.
Open adhesiolysis has been the favored approach regarding surgical management of intestinal obstruction. Following the development of laparoscopic devices and necessary surgical techniques, laparoscopic treatment of intestinal obstruction and adhesion has been tried in highly selected cases. Our study was designed to investigate laparoscopic adhesiolysis to treat intestinal obstruction.
Methods:
The clinicopathologic data and surgical outcomes of 14 patients who underwent emergency laparoscopy between January 2007 and April 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
Five patients had a history of abdominal surgery, and twelve patients had adhesive intestinal obstruction. The causes of adhesive intestinal obstruction included tuberculous peritonitis, periappendiceal abscess, serosal fibrosis and chronic inflammation of intestine, gastric volvulus by fibrotic band. Two patients had non-adhesive intestinal obstruction, caused by intussusception and small bowel ulcer with stricture. The mean surgical time was 98.5 minutes, with mean blood loss of 35 ml. One case was converted to open surgery (7.1%). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.5 days. The mean time to oral intake was 3.4 days. There were no postoperative complications or deaths.
Conclusion:
When the patients are selected carefully in accordance with the guidelines, in our experience laparoscopic adhesiolysis is safe and feasible.