, Akihiro Usui, Yu Hashimoto, Fumitaka Kato, Koji Amano, Hiroyuki Kayata, Nobutaka Mukai, Naoki Shinyama 
, Ji Young Jang, Sungho Lee 
, Namryeol Kim 
, Giljae Lee, Jungnam Lee, Byungchul Yu Citations
Citations
The concept of acute care surgery (ACS) incorporates trauma, surgical critical care, and emergency general surgery. It was designed in the early 2000s by the United States as a solution to the looming crisis of trauma care and non-trauma emergency surgery. Reduced surgical opportunities for trauma surgeons resulted in a decreased interest in trauma surgery. Surgical sub-specialization further accelerated an indifference towards trauma and emergency general surgery. Started in 2008, the trauma center project in Korea is still in its infancy. Although the need for ACS was presented since the inception of the trauma center project, there was a lack of implementation at trauma centers due to government regulations. However, ACS has been initiated at several non-trauma center hospitals and is mainly operated by surgical intensivists. Studies demonstrate that adding emergency surgery to a trauma service does not compromise the care of the injured patients, despite an increase in trauma volume. Positive impacts of ACS are reported by numerous researches. We believe that the development and advancement of trauma centers will necessitate a discussion for the implementation of the ACS model at trauma centers in Korea.
Citations
Decisions regarding perioperative blood transfusions are subject to clinical and laboratory factors. Blood transfusions are associated with increased risk of infection, sepsis, organ failure, and length of stay. Current guidelines on transfusions are based on elective settings. There is a paucity of data on blood transfusion use in emergency surgery. This study reviews the appropriateness of blood transfusions in patients undergoing emergency general surgical laparotomies.
Patients undergoing emergency general surgical laparotomies at Peninsula Health from January 2013 to May 2015 were reviewed. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels triggering transfusion and overall blood utilization were obtained. Transfusions were classified based on whether they were given pre-, intra- or postoperatively. Transfusions with Hb ＞80 g/L in the absence of bleeding or preoperative anemia were deemed ‘inappropriate’ as per Australian Blood Authority guidelines.
Over the 29-month period, 368 patients underwent 398 emergency laparotomies. Blood transfusions were given to 102 patients (27.7%). These patients required 240 transfusion episodes. Patients were given a median of three units of blood. One hundred and sixty-six transfusions (69.2%) were postoperative. Forty-six transfusions (19.2%) were given with Hb ＞80 g/L in the absence of other indications, and were deemed inappropriate. Inappropriate transfusions occurred more frequently on the ward compared to ICU (p<0.05). Almost two thirds of inappropriate transfusions were given for Hb 80∼85 g/L.
Nearly one in five patients received an inappropriate transfusion. More judicious use of blood products in emergency patients is required, especially on surgical wards.
Citations
, Kyoung Mi Lee, In Byung Kim, Heon-Kyun Ha, Wan Sung Kim, Hyoun Jong Moon, Jin Ho Jeong, Kang Kook Choi Acute care surgery (ACS) models have evolved worldwide over the last decade. However, South Korea has an established trauma system and does not consider the ACS model. This study compares the management and outcome of emergency cholecystectomy in the ACS model to those of traditional on-call attending surgeon model for emergency surgery.
Retrospectively collected data for patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy from May 2013 to January 2015 was analyzed to compare data from a traditional on-call system (OCS) and ACS.
One hundred and twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study (62 patients ACS vs. 62 patients OCS). Hospital stay (days) (ACS=4.29±2.49 vs. OCS=4.82±4.48, p=0.46) and stay in emergency room (minutes) (ACS=213.10±113.99 vs. OCS=241.10±150.73, p=0.20) did not differ significantly between groups. Operation time (minutes) was significantly shorter in the ACS than OCS group (389.97±215.21 vs. 566.35±290.14, p<0.001). Other clinical variables (sex, open-conversion rate, whether the operation was performed at night/holiday, intensive care unit admission rate) did not differ between groups. There was no mortality and readmission.
The implementation of the ACS led to shorter operation time and no increase of postoperative mortality and complication.
Citations
Timing of surgery is important for prognosis. In patients with acute abdomen, the urgency means timing of surgery is even more important. However early emergency surgery is often logistically daunting because of constraints on resources such as operating room, supporting anesthesiologist, and nurses. Therefore it is worthwhile reviewing the timing of surgery in the patient with acute abdomen. The authors discuss the ideal time to surgery based on their experience and a review of the literature. For appendicitis and for peptic ulcer perforation, the authors recommend surgery within 24 hours from symptom onset. However, for other acute abdomen disease, evidence for a consensus is not as strong. If a surgeon faces a large number of emergent patients, if resources are limited, the surgeon must decide priorities for surgery. Therefore, an emergency triage system is needed, based on expert opinion and evidence. Although several triage systems are described in the literature, there is some controversy. If we follow a triage system, utilization of resources will be more efficient and acute care surgery might be performed within the ideal time.
Citations
E-SUBMISSION
First
Prev
