• KSACS
  • KATN
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

The Incidence and Impact of Abdominal Surgery on Delirium in Abdominal Trauma Patients

Journal of Acute Care Surgery 2020;10(2):42-46.
Published online: July 24, 2020

Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea

*Corresponding Author: Young Goun Jo, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea, E-mail: thinkjo82@gmail.com
• Received: November 13, 2018   • Revised: May 15, 2019   • Accepted: October 28, 2019

©2020 Korean Society of Acute Care Surgery

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).

  • 5,200 Views
  • 88 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next
  • Purpose
    The occurrence of trauma-related delirium following postoperative abdominal surgery is associated with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to identify predictive risk factors for trauma-related delirium.
  • Methods
    Trauma patient data from a regional trauma center were retrospectively collected from August 2015 to December 2016. The primary inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with trauma-related delirium following abdominal trauma surgery. Head trauma patients and those under 18 years of age were excluded from this study. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors associated with trauma-related delirium.
  • Results
    Of the 255 trauma patients who met the inclusion criteria, 32 (12.5%) were diagnosed with delirium. The mean values for the age of the patients, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and length of intensive care unit stay were 52.1 ± 17.8 years, 16.9, 14, and 7.1 days, respectively. Among the measured parameters, age [odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.06; p = 0.022)], sex (OR, 0.125; 0.03–0.55; p = 0.006), hemoglobin level (OR, 0.875; CI, 0.68–0.98; p = 0.03), length of stay in the intensive care unit (OR, 1.12; CI, 1.03–1.22; p = 0.01), and having an abdominal operation (OR, 2.92; CI, 1.10–7.23; p = 0.011) showed strong correlations with trauma-related delirium
  • Conclusion
    This study showed that abdominal surgery was strongly associated with delirium in patients with traumatic abdominal injury. Thus, changes in consciousness should be carefully monitored following surgery.
Delirium occurs in 14% to 24% of hospital patients, of which there is a high prevalence (15–53%) in elderly patients during the post-operative period [1]. Delirium is characterized by an abrupt appearance of symptoms, and its occurrence is common in acute phase trauma patients. Delirium is a syndrome caused by physical and mental changes, and triggers a wide range of symptoms, including decreased brain function. It has been shown that delirium affects the course of treatment and increases mortality rates in postoperative trauma patients [2,3]. Delirium is influenced by environmental factors, patient’s characteristics, chronic pathologies and acute illnesses [4]. Age, mechanical ventilation, alcohol use, emergency surgery and trauma are known risk factors associated with this condition [5,6]. In trauma patients, delirium is not uncommon, and it increases the duration of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay. It also affects the duration of mechanical ventilation independent to the severity of the trauma [7,8]. Understanding the etiology and underlying causes of delirium could lead to a better prognosis through improved prevention and treatment. In this study, we aimed to identify the predictive risk factors for delirium in trauma patients.
1. Study design and patient selection criteria
Between August 2015 and December 2016, patient data were collected retrospectively from a regional trauma center. During the study period, 4,315 injured patients visited the Emergency Department. Of these patients, 817 were major trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 [9]. The primary inclusion criteria were the patients diagnosed with trauma-related delirium following abdominal trauma surgery.
The treatment plan was decided by the trauma surgeon in the emergency room, based on the patient’s injured organ, general health status, and any underlying disease. Patients were excluded if they presented without abdominal injuries, were under 18 years of age, or had head injuries.
Conservative treatment was initiated when there was no evidence of hollow organ injuries observed during physical examination, blood test, or other injury signs requiring laparotomy. After the initial treatment [exploratory laparotomy under general anesthesia (n = 99) or angioembolization (n = 57)], patients were admitted either to the ICU or to a general ward, depending on their general health status and vital signs. If patients exhibited a change in level of consciousness during the daily ICU surgical rounds, delirium was diagnosed using the Mini Mental State Examination and a psychiatric consultation was requested for evaluation of cognitive function using the Delirium Rating Scale rather than using a delirium diagnostic tool, such as the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM–ICU) [10,11].
After diagnosis of delirium by the surgeon, paitents’ symptoms were controlled using drugs like dexmedetomidine, and if a symptom was severe, haloperidol or lorazepam were used. After psychiatric consultation, drugs were prescribed which they recommended. Psychiatrists visited the patients to assess the symptom improvement. When a patient’s symptoms (including confusion, anxiety) were too severe to wait for psychiatric care, empirical treatment with drugs were used as described above.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Chonnam National University Hospital (IRB no.: CNUH-2019-115).
2. Statistical analysis
Continuous data were presented as medians with range, and categorical data were presented as proportions. Continuous variables were compared using the t-test, while proportions were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as deemed appropriate. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors associated with trauma-related delirium. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant risk factors. To adjust for confounding factors, variables with a univariate p < 0.05 were included in the multivariate analysis. A p <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Version 21.0, Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows.
There were 562 of 817 major trauma patients whose data were excluded from the study.
Of the 255 patients who were admitted to ICU, 32 (12.5%) were diagnosed with delirium. The average age of the patients with delirium was 63.9 ± 12.9 years, and 29 (90%) of them were males. The average ISS value for all patients admitted to ICU was 16.2. Both interventional radiology and surgery were performed to treat abdominal injuries. There were 99 abdominal surgeries performed which included damage control surgery with temporary abdominal closure, bowel resection and anastomosis (small bowel or colon and enterostomy formation), hemostasis (including liver suture hemostasis, omentum ligation, mesentery and internal iliac vessel ligation), splenectomy, gastro-jejunostomy after distal gastrectomy and serosal repair of bowel injury. Regarding sedation and pain control, dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, and midazolam were used, and titrations were performed according to the patients’ condition (Table 1).
All patients diagnosed with delirium were admitted to the ICU (n = 32) and had on average, longer ICU stays than patients who did not present with delirium (7.1 ± 5.8 vs. 3.2 ± 3.5 days, p < 0.01). The number of ventilator days was also higher in the group diagnosed with delirium (2.2 ± 3.3 vs. 0.6 ± 2.0 days, p < 0.016). All deaths occurred within 30 days of admission and during the period of hospitalization. Considering injury severity and occurrence of delirium, the Abbreviated Injury Scale score of abdominal injury was higher in the patients with delirium, but there was no significant difference when comparing thoracic injury and extremity injury, and ISS score (Table 2). Based on univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with the development of delirium: age, sex, hemoglobin level, albumin, abdominal ISS, transfusion, operation, length of ICU stay, ventilator application time and ventilator days, and use of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine.
Multivariate regression analysis showed that age, sex, hemoglobin level, duration of ICU stay, and having abdominal operation are independent risk factors for delirium. Among these, abdominal surgery [odds ratio (OR), 2.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.199–7.133; p = 0.011)] was observed to be the most significant factor related to the incidence of delirium (Table 3).
Delirium is a syndrome that is characterized by an abrupt onset and a fluctuating course, with attention deficit as its core cognitive feature. Changes from a patient’s previous baseline are important and show cognitive symptoms such as disorientation, defective memory, and constructional apraxia. Diagnosis of delirium is based on clinical findings such as the patient’s medical history, examination of physical and mental status, and a review of medical tests [12]. The occurrence of delirium is the result of multiple factors, of which trauma is a major risk factor. In this current study, age, sex, low hemoglobin level, surgery, and length of ICU stay were observed to be closely related to the incidence of trauma-related delirium.
Von Rueden et al [13] reported the incidence of delirium among patients admitted to the intermittent care unit, and the ICU. The of delirium prevalence (24%) was significantly associated with the use of mechanical ventilation, psychotropic medications, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores, and low Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores [13]. In this current study, all patients with delirium were admitted to the ICU, where they had relatively long ICU stays. In ICU, the prevalence of delirium ranges from 20–80% based on disease severity and the diagnostic method used. In addition to a patient’s medical status, uncomfortable ICU environments influence patient outcome [14,15]. In a multicenter study involving 523 ICU-associated cases of delirium, data were collected and analyzed by Van Rompaey et al [4] based on patient characteristics, chronic pathologies, acute illnesses, and environmental factors, and an incidence rate of 30% was reported.
Consistent with the previous findings, this current study showed that aging and surgery with general anesthesia were closely related to delirium. Bryczkowski et al [16] reported that age was an independent risk factor for delirium in trauma patients who were admitted to the Surgical ICU. The occurrence of delirium in the elderly leads to functional decline, and longer hospitalization and institutionalization, and increases the incidence of complications such as falls and aspiration pneumonia [17]. Post-operative delirium occurs after surgical procedures under general anesthesia, and its incidence has been shown to range from 9% to 87% depending on the type of surgery and the age of the patient [18]. Surgery results in a systemic inflammatory response, subsequently affecting the patient’s cognitive functions [18].
With the development of radiological diagnostic methods and techniques, it has become possible to establish various treatment plans according to the patient’s condition. In the Trauma Division, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, selective non–operative management is performed for solid organ injuries, including liver, spleen, and kidney injuries. Angioembolization of the internal iliac artery after pelvic bone fracture is also performed if the patient’s condition is stable [19].
The results in this current study showed that the occurrence of delirium in patients who received interventional radiology was not significantly different from the group that did not receive intervention. Whereas those who underwent surgery were statistically significantly more likely to develop delirium which may be associated with postoperative pain and physiological changes after surgery.
The major limitations of this study related to the screening and diagnosis of the patients. Patients were diagnosed with delirium through the Mini-Mental State Examination and clinical examination, and screened during daily surgical rounds of the ICU. However, diagnostic tools such as CAM-ICU can be a better option in the diagnosis of delirium. The diagnosis and screening approach may have led to the exclusion of relatively hypoactive type patients. Gual et al [20] have reported that the proportion of hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed type delirium in older vulnerable patients with chronic conditions was 25.9%, 40.6%, and 31%, respectively. In another study, Marcantonio et al [21] reported that the psychomotor types of delirium after hip surgery in the elderly and the pure hypoactive type accounted for 71%of the patients. Thus, it is likely that in this current study, patients with hypoactive delirium may have been overlooked. Moreover, this study was not a large, multi-center, randomized, retrospective study which may be limiting.
In conclusion, consistent with previously published studies, this study showed that age, being male, and surgery with general anesthesia are associated with delirium. Most importantly, delirium was significantly associated with patients who had abdominal surgery resulting from abdominal traumatic injuries. To address this issue further, careful observation of changes in the level of consciousness of the patient in the post-operative period is necessary, and early diagnosis of this condition followed by the appropriate treatment is recommended.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Table 1
Patient characteristics.
Delirum

Present (n = 32) Absent (n = 223) p
Patient demographic
 Age (y) 63.9 ± 12.9 52.1 ± 17.8 < 0.010
 Sex
  Males 29 (15.8) 154 (84.2) < 0.010
  Females 3 (4.2) 69 (95.8)

Laboratory findings
 WBC (10^3/ul) 13.6 ± 6.4 14.32 ± 11.2 0.719

Hgb (mmHg) 10.4 ± 2.1 11.7 ± 2.6 < 0.010
 Platelet (10^3/ul) 242.1 ± 259.1 199 ± 81.7 0.358
 Neutrophil (%) 77.49 ± 15.3 77.25 ± 12.2 0.921
 B.E (mmol/L) −4.5 ± 6.6 −3.5 ± 5.7 0.341
 Albumin (g/dL) 2.9 ± 0.6 3.3 ± 0.7 < 0.010
 Lactate (mmol/L) 3 ± 2.0 2.7 ± 2.7 0.524

Injury severity
 ISS 17 ± 5.9 15.6 ± 8.6 0.244
 Chest 1 ± 1.4 1.2 ± 1.4 0.455
 Abdomen 3.2 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 0.8 0.018
 Extremity 0.91 ± 1.42 1.07 ± 1.4 0.162

Treatment transfusion < 0.010
 Yes 25 (78.1) 118 (52.9)
 No 7 (21.9) 105 (47.1)

Angioembolization 0.402
 Yes 9 (28.1) 48 (21.5)
 No 23 (71.9) 175 (78.5)

Operation < 0.010
 Yes 20 (62.5) 79 (35.4)
 No 12 (37.5) 144 (64.6)

Duration of drug (d)
 Remifentanil 2.9 ± 4.5 0.6 ± 2.0 < 0.010
 Dexmedetomidine 1.7 ± 2.6 0.4 ± 1.6 0.011
 Midazolam 0.6 ± 2.3 0.1 ± 0.6 0.192

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.

WBC = white blood cell; Hgb = hemoglobin; B.E = base excess; ISS = injury severity score.

Table 2
Factors associated with delirium.
Delirum

Present (n = 32) Absent (n = 223) p
Clinical course
 ICU 0.011
  Yes 32 (100) 189 (84.8)
  No 0 (0) 34 (15.2)
 Ventilator used < 0.010
  Yes 13 (40.6) 35 (15.7)
  No 19 (59.4) 188 (84.3)
 ICU stay (d) 7.1 ± 5.8 3.2 ± 3.5 < 0.010
 Ventilator (d) 2.2 ± 3.3 0.6 ± 2.0 0.016
 Death 1
  Yes 2 (6.2) 17 (7.6)
  No 30 (93.8) 206 (92.4)

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.

ICU = intensive care unit.

Table 3
Multivariate regression analysis of risk factors associated with delirium.
Predictor 95% Confidence intervals
Odds ratio Lower Higher p
Age (y) 1.034 1.005 1.064 0.022
Sex 0.125 0.028 0.553 0.006
Hgb (mmHg) 0.875 0.681 0.980 0.030
Operation 2.924 1.199 7.133 0.018
ICU stay 1.121 1.027 1.224 0.011

Hgb = hemoglobin; ICU = intensive care unit.

  • 1. Inouye SK. Delirium in older persons. New Eng J Med 2006;354(11):1157–65.
  • 2. Lawlor PG, Bush SH. Delirium diagnosis, screening, and management. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2014;8(3):286–95.
  • 3. Meagher DJ, Morandi A, Inouye SK, Ely W, Adamis D, Maclullich AJ, et al. Concordance between DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for delirium diagnosis in a pooled database of 768 prospectively evaluated patients using the delirium rating scale-revised-98. BMC Med 2014;12:164.
  • 4. Van Rompaey B, Elseviers MM, Schuurmans MJ, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Truijen S, Bossaert L. Risk factors for delirium in intensive care patients: A prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2009;13(3):R77.
  • 5. Zaal IJ, Devlin JW, Peelen LM, Slooter AJ. A systematic review of risk factors for delirium in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2015;43(1):40–7.
  • 6. Kat MG, de Jonghe JF, Vreeswijk R, van der Ploeg T, van Gool WA, Eikelenboom P, et al. Mortality associated with delirium after hip-surgery: A 2-year follow-up study. Age Ageing 2011;40(3):312–8.
  • 7. Blondell RD, Powell GE, Dodds HN, Looney SW, Lukan JK. Admission characteristics of trauma patients in whom delirium develops. Am J Surg 2004;187(3):332–7.
  • 8. Lat I, McMillian W, Taylor S, Janzen JM, Papadopoulos S, Korth L, et al. The impact of delirium on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated surgical and trauma patients. Crit Care Med 2009;37(6):1898–905.
  • 9. Palmer C. Major trauma and the injury severity score--where should we set the bar? Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 2007;51:13–29.
  • 10. Soja SL, Pandharipande PP, Fleming SB, Cotton BA, Miller LR, Weaver SG, et al. Implementation, reliability testing, and compliance monitoring of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in trauma patients. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(7):1263–8.
  • 11. Grover S, Kate N. Assessment scales for delirium: A review. World J Psychiatry 2012;2(4):58–70.
  • 12. Neufeld KJ, Thomas C. Delirium: Definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis. J Clin Neurophysiol 2013;30(5):438–42.
  • 13. Von Rueden KT, Wallizer B, Thurman P, McQuillan K, Andrews T, Merenda J, et al. Delirium in Trauma Patients: Prevalence and Predictors. Crit Care Nurse 2017;37(1):40–8.
  • 14. Girard TD, Pandharipande PP, Ely EW. Delirium in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 2008;12(Suppl 3):S3.
  • 15. Reade MC, Finfer S. Sedation and delirium in the intensive care unit. New Eng J Med 2014;370(5):444–54.
  • 16. Bryczkowski SB, Lopreiato MC, Yonclas PP, Sacca JJ, Mosenthal AC. Risk factors for delirium in older trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;77(6):944–51.
  • 17. Robinson TN, Eiseman B. Postoperative delirium in the elderly: Diagnosis and management. Clin Interv Aging 2008;3(2):351–5.
  • 18. Whitlock EL, Vannucci A, Avidan MS. Postoperative delirium. Minerva Anestesiol 2011;77(4):448–56.
  • 19. Roudsari BS, Psoter KJ, Padia SA, Kogut MJ, Kwan SW. Utilization of angiography and embolization for abdominopelvic trauma: 14 years’ experience at a level I trauma center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(6):W580–5.
  • 20. Gual N, Inzitari M, Carrizo G, Calle A, Udina C, Yuste A, et al. Delirium Subtypes and Associated Characteristics in Older Patients with Exacerbation of Chronic Conditions. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018;26(12):1204–12.
  • 21. Marcantonio E, Ta T, Duthie E, Resnick NM. Delirium severity and psychomotor types: their relationship with outcomes after hip fracture repair. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50(5):850–7.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Management and Outcomes of Traumatic Liver Injury: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care Center Experience
      Tariq Alanezi, Abdulmajeed Altoijry, Aued Alanazi, Ziyad Aljofan, Talal Altuwaijri, Kaisor Iqbal, Sultan AlSheikh, Nouran Molla, Mansour Altuwaijri, Abdullah Aloraini, Fawaz Altuwaijri, Mohammed Yousef Aldossary
      Healthcare.2024; 12(2): 131.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    The Incidence and Impact of Abdominal Surgery on Delirium in Abdominal Trauma Patients
    J Acute Care Surg. 2020;10(2):42-46.   Published online July 24, 2020
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    The Incidence and Impact of Abdominal Surgery on Delirium in Abdominal Trauma Patients
    J Acute Care Surg. 2020;10(2):42-46.   Published online July 24, 2020
    Close
    The Incidence and Impact of Abdominal Surgery on Delirium in Abdominal Trauma Patients
    The Incidence and Impact of Abdominal Surgery on Delirium in Abdominal Trauma Patients

    Patient characteristics.

    Delirum

    Present (n = 32) Absent (n = 223) p
    Patient demographic
     Age (y) 63.9 ± 12.9 52.1 ± 17.8 < 0.010
     Sex
      Males 29 (15.8) 154 (84.2) < 0.010
      Females 3 (4.2) 69 (95.8)

    Laboratory findings
     WBC (10^3/ul) 13.6 ± 6.4 14.32 ± 11.2 0.719

    Hgb (mmHg) 10.4 ± 2.1 11.7 ± 2.6 < 0.010
     Platelet (10^3/ul) 242.1 ± 259.1 199 ± 81.7 0.358
     Neutrophil (%) 77.49 ± 15.3 77.25 ± 12.2 0.921
     B.E (mmol/L) −4.5 ± 6.6 −3.5 ± 5.7 0.341
     Albumin (g/dL) 2.9 ± 0.6 3.3 ± 0.7 < 0.010
     Lactate (mmol/L) 3 ± 2.0 2.7 ± 2.7 0.524

    Injury severity
     ISS 17 ± 5.9 15.6 ± 8.6 0.244
     Chest 1 ± 1.4 1.2 ± 1.4 0.455
     Abdomen 3.2 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 0.8 0.018
     Extremity 0.91 ± 1.42 1.07 ± 1.4 0.162

    Treatment transfusion < 0.010
     Yes 25 (78.1) 118 (52.9)
     No 7 (21.9) 105 (47.1)

    Angioembolization 0.402
     Yes 9 (28.1) 48 (21.5)
     No 23 (71.9) 175 (78.5)

    Operation < 0.010
     Yes 20 (62.5) 79 (35.4)
     No 12 (37.5) 144 (64.6)

    Duration of drug (d)
     Remifentanil 2.9 ± 4.5 0.6 ± 2.0 < 0.010
     Dexmedetomidine 1.7 ± 2.6 0.4 ± 1.6 0.011
     Midazolam 0.6 ± 2.3 0.1 ± 0.6 0.192

    Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.

    WBC = white blood cell; Hgb = hemoglobin; B.E = base excess; ISS = injury severity score.

    Factors associated with delirium.

    Delirum

    Present (n = 32) Absent (n = 223) p
    Clinical course
     ICU 0.011
      Yes 32 (100) 189 (84.8)
      No 0 (0) 34 (15.2)
     Ventilator used < 0.010
      Yes 13 (40.6) 35 (15.7)
      No 19 (59.4) 188 (84.3)
     ICU stay (d) 7.1 ± 5.8 3.2 ± 3.5 < 0.010
     Ventilator (d) 2.2 ± 3.3 0.6 ± 2.0 0.016
     Death 1
      Yes 2 (6.2) 17 (7.6)
      No 30 (93.8) 206 (92.4)

    Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.

    ICU = intensive care unit.

    Multivariate regression analysis of risk factors associated with delirium.

    Predictor 95% Confidence intervals
    Odds ratio Lower Higher p
    Age (y) 1.034 1.005 1.064 0.022
    Sex 0.125 0.028 0.553 0.006
    Hgb (mmHg) 0.875 0.681 0.980 0.030
    Operation 2.924 1.199 7.133 0.018
    ICU stay 1.121 1.027 1.224 0.011

    Hgb = hemoglobin; ICU = intensive care unit.

    Table 1 Patient characteristics.

    Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.

    WBC = white blood cell; Hgb = hemoglobin; B.E = base excess; ISS = injury severity score.

    Table 2 Factors associated with delirium.

    Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.

    ICU = intensive care unit.

    Table 3 Multivariate regression analysis of risk factors associated with delirium.

    Hgb = hemoglobin; ICU = intensive care unit.

    TOP